Sunday, November 8, 2009
Introduction
Searching for periodicals
Evaluating Periodicals Worksheet
The following criteria and questions can help you to judge the value of a source.
Instructions: Use the periodicals you have found on our class topic. Answer the following questions in order to assess the credibility of your chosen source; you may need to do some additional research:
1. First, write the full reference here:
Momentum (19403410); Fall2009, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p43-45, 3p
2. Evaluate Authority: Who is the author of this text? Do they have a degree or other expertise that qualifies them to write on the subject? What else has the author published?
Dr. Allen C. Bowling is Neurologist and Nutrition Expert he has a master degree and a PhD in pharmacology, he also has a PhD in author of alternative Medicine and Multiple Sclerosis. He published two books and he’s the author of several journals.
3. Evaluate Affiliation: What institution (company, organization, university, etc.) published this text? Is it a commercial or non-profit publisher? What else does the institution publish? Could the author's affiliation with this publisher bias their work?
This article has been published by Momentum and it is a property of National Multiple sclerosis Society.
4. Evaluate Currency: When was the text published and/or last updated? Will you use it for current information or for historical context?
The text was published in fall 2009.
5. Evaluate Audience: Who is the intended audience (students, educators, the general public, experts) for the text? Is it written for someone with a small or large amount of knowledge on the subject?
This text can be read by people interested on music therapy or on medicine it’s true that it contains some scientific terms but any one can understand its content easily.
6. Evaluate Purpose: What appears to be the purpose of this text? Is it to inform, persuade, entertain, report, or refute?
The author of this text is trying to persuad the reader that music can be used in therapy and he is explaining the influence of music on the brain.
7. Evaluate Sources: Where did the author get their information? Is there a bibliography? Are there footnotes? Does the author refer to primary or secondary material?
Dr। Allen C. Bowling is a specialist in the domain and he studied different aspect of this influence of music on the brain and how it could be used in healing.
8. Conclusion: Now that you have assessed the source in more detail, do you still think it is useful? Explain why or why not
Searching for books
Evaluating Books Worksheet
The following criteria and questions can help you to judge the value of a source.Instructions: Use the book you have found on our class topic in the Mohammed VI Library.
Answer the following questions in order to assess the credibility of your chosen source; you may find the answers by checking through the appropriate parts of the book, or you may need to do some additional research:
1. First, write the full reference here:
Randall McClellan. 1991. The healing forces of music History, Theory, and practice. ToExcel an imprint of iUniverse.com, INC (USA).
2; Evaluate Authority: Who is the author of this text? Do they have a degree or other expertise that qualifies them to write on the subject? What else has the author published?
Randall is a safety Supervisor at Major Drilling, he has traveled the United States to several offices to implement policies. He also wrote and directed programs for the company and investigated all accidents and incidents. Randall helped redevelop their Tower Rescue Procedures and Competent Climbing Procedures under the direction of Bob Rogers (National Safety Director). He is also certified OSHA Outreach Instructor, MSHA Instructor, FA/CPR Instructor, High Angle Rescue Instructor, and Confined Space Rescue Instructor
3. Evaluate Affiliation: What institution (company, organization, university, etc.) published this book? Is it a commercial or non-profit publisher? What else does the institution publish? Would the author's affiliation with this publisher bias their work?
The book was published by toExcel an imprint of iUniverse.com INC.
4. Evaluate Currency: When was the book published and/or last updated? Will you use it for current information or for historical context?
The book was published in 1991. I will be using that book to get more information about my topic and try to see the different sides of the subject.
5. Evaluate Audience: Who is the intended audience (students, educators, the general public, experts) for the book? Is it written for someone with a small or large amount of knowledge on the subject?
The audience of this book is every one since as far I a read on the book I didn’t find any scientific terms or any specialised words.
6. Evaluate Purpose: What appears to be the purpose for the book? Is it to inform, persuade, entertain, report, or refute?
The purpose of the book is to inform and demonstrate the divers healing forces of music.
7. Evaluate Sources: Where did the author get their information? Is there a bibliography? Are there footnotes? Does the author refer to primary or secondary material?
the authors used a large bibliography which clearly shows that the authors is well informed about the topic and that before writing this book he made a great research work.
8. Conclusion: Now that you have assessed your book in more detail, do you still think it is useful? Explain why or why not. If you do intend to use it, name the chapters or sections that you think will be most useful for your topic.
well actually I have chosen four books from the library still didn’t read all the chapters that I judged useful but until now I can say that the healing forces of music would be very useful in my research and the principles of healing with sound (chapter 4), I will also use the third part of chapter eleven which talks about the application of music for therapeutic purposes, in addition the many others like chapter ten, twelve, thirteen, etc
Searching for a website
Internet Sources
1. Write down the full reference for three possible internet sources for your research:
a. “first love an idealized object in music therapy” voice’s. no, Vol 9 (2). 1 July 2009, web
b. “Hard and Heavy Music: Can It Make a Difference in the Young Cancer Patients’ Life?” voice’s. no, Vol 9 (2). 1 July 2009, web
c. “Music Therapy, Song and Communication” voice’s. no, Vol 9 (2). 1 July 2009, web
2. Choose the one you are most interested in, and explain why you think it is a credible source:
“Music Therapy, Song and Communication” voice’s. no, Vol 9 (2). 1 July 2009, web. Well actually all the sources are from a search browser that is specialized on music were we can find any thing that is related to music and it’s a well known web site even if most Moroccan don’t know it.
3. For the source you chose, explain what type of information it contains, and how that information is useful for your project:
The web site I have chosen contains an article that intends to make a reflection about the links between Music Therapy, Song and communication.
4. Evaluate the objectivity of the source, based on what you have learned from class discussions and readings such as "How to Evaluate Information on the Web".
This web sites which contains this article is very credible since it has a well known sponsor, in addition to that most articles on it can be found on the first places on the results lists on EBSCO HOST or Jstor.
SSK 1212 Evaluating Document from EBSCO Database Worksheet
Instructions: Use the document you have found. Answer the following questions. In order to assess the credibility of your chosen source; you may need to do some additional research:
1. First, write the full reference here:
"PERSPECTIVES ON MUSIC AND MUSIC THERAPY IN ADULT CANCER CARE." Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology 5.4 (2007): 169. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 Oct. 2009.
2. Evaluate Authority: Who is the author of this text? Do they have a degree or other expertise that qualifies them to write on the subject? What else has the author published?
ROBERTS, Peter, is a Bone-marrow specialist, MD, Ph.D, and he is a Member of the Executive Committee, Past Chair, International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry.
3. Evaluate Affiliation: What institution (company, organization, university, etc.) published this text? Is it a commercial or non-profit publisher? What else does the institution publish? Could the author's affiliation with this publisher bias their work?
Australian Nursing Journal, is an Australian Nursing Federation that presents news, reviews, research and essays for and about Australian nurses. And it’s an organization that publishes journals.
4. Evaluate Currency: When was the text published and/or last updated? Will you use it for current information or for historical context?
8 Oct. 2009, I will use this article because it’s a current article that has recently been published in a well known journal.
5. Evaluate Purpose: What appears to be the purpose of this text? Is it to inform, persuade, entertain, report, or refute? Explain why do you think so.
The purpose of this text is to report on the efforts of a team of nurses and musicians whom investigated into the therapeutic effects of harp music in palliative care in victoria
6. Write here specifically what information from this document you are going to use in your paper.
I will use the results of the investigation that has been done. And also use the information given about the benefits of music therapy to palliative care services
7 Conclusion: Now that you have assessed the source in more detail, do you still think it is useful? Explain why or why not. If it is not useful, what are you going to do about it?
Yes this source would be really useful since it’s first credible contains accurate information and it would be a good source of statistics since it’s a report.
Conclusion
And this is the end of SSK1212 first project. Yes we are done but, I would never forget all the days that we passed working on it, having fun, and sometimes fighting. Well I don’t think that any one of my group would forget these days, we first had a lot of trouble getting used to use the online data bases, since even if we seem to be young, most of use still following the old fashion, this step was done and we were all happy to get it done efficiently. Then we had to read and choose the most relevant information. Well on this part my body had an overdose of caffeine, since I passed long hours reading and highlighting. Yes, we learned a lot, and we also learned painting techniques using highlighters. We also learned the collaboration, patience, communication, argumentation and many other skills thanks to miss Irama, and to the SSK1212.